Michael Jackson has returned from Hades. And I know why he’s come back from the dead…
Or rather, one of my informants, Hollywood insider Heidi-Jane Kalashnikov, knows why…
Just tonite, she said:
“Michael Jackson [has come back from the dead] after discovering that there are no pre-pubescent boys in hell…”
More news is coming in about the candidates in the upcoming by-election in Norwich North, to be held July 23rd. As I write, my contacts on the ground are firing me texts, Twitters and RSS reports.
What is coming out is truly terrifying.
This by-election will be one of the most depraved Britain has yet seen. MPs expenses have nothing on this.
Chloe Smith and Chris Ostrowski – and even Green candidate Rupert Read – are corrupt, drug-crazed degenerates who would shoot you and eat you if they thought it would get them in power. People mean nothing to them.
Norwich North is doomed. The werewolves are howling and citizens in the constituency are walking into it like sheep to the slaughter… there’s little more I can do, so…
Here’s the latest news from my contacts on the ground
Mick James: Norwich North by-election. A guy just called, got the scoop on Tory Cloe Smith frequenting an opium den in Ipswich 2007. A frenzied drug fiend.
Lucy Smith: More Norwich North scoops. Labour’s Chris Ostrowski, known as the “crank man”, amphetamine head, puts Motorhead’s Lemmy in the shade. Scary.
Lyle Boland: Norwich North by-election, July 23. It’s about drug fiends and weird sex in people’s gardens. Make no mistake. We’ve got the evidence. Witnesses. People are prepared to speak out.
Winston Jones: Norwich North by-election. July 23. Armed gangs with pump action shot guns. Looting, anarchy, deranged drug orgies. Tory, Labour, scoop. Even retailer John Lewis (no surprise Chris Ostrowski works for them) is involved. The company is hiring hit men. And it’s got a major drugs cache under one of its leading stores.
Rick Denton: Iain Dale of Total Politics is totally missing the big drugs party…he has no clue what is going on. Chloe Smith, Chris Ostrowski, crazed, cranked up running riot, here in Norwich North now. Scoop.
“There wouldn’t be an America without the automobile…”
Superb Reason TV video interview with U.S. satirist P.J. O’Rourke. He talks about bailouts, easy women, the ruination of the U.S. auto industry, and his new book, Driving Like Crazy.
Norwich North is currently buzzing with rumours of weird sex and drugs parties in people’s gardens…
News is coming in of a massive sex and drugs scandal brewing in the upcoming Norwich North by-election, to be held on July 23. Conservative candidates Chloe Smith and Labour’s Chris Ostrowski apparently are not what they seem.
Smith is a management consultant and Ostrowsky works for retailer John Lewis by day. But according to reports from locals the two election candidates indulge in weird sex and drugs parties – sometimes in people’s back gardens.
One resident of St Williams Way, East Norwich, who asked not to be named, claimed she looked out of her bedroom window at 2am recently and was shocked to see a sex and drugs orgy going on in her garden.
“It was disgusting,” she says. “That Tory Chloe Smith and the Labour Chris Ostrowski were cavorting naked on my herbaceous border. They were using my garden for a sex orgy and doing things I’d never seen done before, even in the hardcore sex movies I like to watch with my neighbours. And they were taking drugs. There was a big mound of white powder on my bird table and they were snorting from it like a pair of pigs at the trough. It was truly horrible.”
Chris Ostrowsky is a Christian Socialist, so you would think he would know better.
But according to experts Christian Socialism is a front for bondage and fetish sex and experimental drug taking.
“Insiders have long known that the Christian Socialism organization is made up of bondage-crazed amphetamine fiends looking for ever greater kicks without fear of being found out,” explains Professor Steve Jameson of the University of East Anglia, a known hotbed of left wing politics and campaign groups calling for larger expenses allowances for Labour Party MPs.
Allegedly, the Green Party candidate, Rupert Read, a University of East Anglia graduate and city councillor, has also been involved in these orgies of sex and drugs.
A resident in the Sprowston area of Norwich said he had seen Read in his garden during the early hours last week in “congress” with unnamed parties, while wielding a Glock automatic pistol.
“I was terrified,” said the householder. “These politicians aren’t content to rip you off on expenses, they want to use your gardens to have sex in, and shoot their guns. They must get a kick out of it. It’s an abomination. Something needs to be done. And soon.”
Local businessman Charlie Rhodes was quoted as saying:
“These politicians are snorting cocaine like depraved hyenas at a carcass. The worst of it is, there’s no drugs left for the rest of us. What the f**k we gonna do in Norwich North without drugs? The expense scandal was bad enough. But to think that the likes of Chloe Smith, Rupert Read and Chris Ostrowski are snorting all our cocaine is just the last straw.”
Romance novel publisher Harlequin Mills & Boon says it sold 10,000 e-books in May.
Lately, the publisher, which sells 200 million books each year and is currently is celebrating its 100th birthday, has been offering its titles in both paper and digital formats.
Tim Cooper, the director of direct and digital marketing at Mills & Boon, says e-books form an "integral part of the future of publishing."
To me, this is a big deal.
Mills & Boon – often made fun of by literary types in the UK – could prove to be the publisher that makes the e-book revolution happen.
One thing is for sure, Mills & Boon can boast a loyal following of romance fans, who will buy nearly every book put out by the firm; whereas most other publishers just ride from one title to the next, and don’t really have a dedicated fan base.
So well done Mills & Boon!
I’m as riled as a rat that’s just had its coat shampooed. You see, there’s an important local by-election in the Norwich North constituency, where I live.
The most likely winner will be the Conservative candidate, Chloe Smith. But the Labour guy Chris Ostrowski might just swing it, if he’s very lucky.
The only problem is, these two are about as exciting as having a Jehovah’s Witness on your doorstep.
But the other candidates are no better. The drippy eco-campaigning Green Party, for example, is fielding University of East Anglia (UEA) lecturer and city councillor Rupert Read, a pious cabbage cruncher who thinks the world will end if we don’t drive Citreon 2CVs and recycle our nail clippings.
You can’t have a reasoned discussion with the Greens, anymore than you can with a Jehovah’s Witness. Both are true believers in their chosen creed and there’s no shaking them.
OK. You might argue that the Green Party’s position has some basis in science and reason. But you’d be wrong. The Greens are as much purveyors of mistruths as Jehovah’s Witnesses. Put another way, they’re liars.
The Greens push the idea of global warming, for example. But the truth is global warming stopped in 1998, and we’re now undergoing a period of cooling. And besides, the planet has always gone through periods of warming and cooling.
During the 16th and 17th centuries, Britain went through a particularly cool period. The River Thames would freeze over in winter and festivals were held on it. During the Roman occupation, there were vineyards as far north as Northampton.
The Greens don’t talk about such "inconvenient evidence." Just like Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t like to talk about the theory of evolution.
If something doesn’t fit their model of reality, they reject it.
Don’t get me wrong. I want a clean planet. I want my tuna as pure as the driven snow. I want clean rivers. I want clean air. But the Greens won’t help with this; they’re blaggers who distort science to their own ends.
Worse still, they’re puritans who love to stop people having fun.
Say no to eco-fascism: Don’t vote Green.
This may or may not have come from a US soldier serving in Afghanistan. But according to Clayton Cramer, who it was emailed to, it sounds like it could have.
“YOU MAY BE TALIBAN IF …”
1. You refine heroin for a living but you have a moral objection to beer.
2. You own a $3,000 machine gun and $5,000 rocket launcher but you can’t afford shoes.
3. You have more wives than teeth.
4. You wipe your butt with your bare hand but consider bacon “unclean.”
5. You think vests come in two styles: bullet-proof and suicide.
6. You can’t think of anyone you haven’t declared Jihad against.
7. You consider television dangerous but routinely carry explosives in your clothing.
8. You were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs.
9. You have nothing against women and think every man should own at least one.
10. You’ve always had a crush on your neighbor’s goat.
I’m as mad as Richard Dawkins after having had a visitation from God. Why? Because the main candidates in the Norwich North by-election, to be held on July 23rd, are so boring.
The Tory candidate, 27-year-old Chloe Smith, for example, looks set to pull a victory, and achieve her long-held ambition of nabbing a seat in the Commons. But come on Norwich North citizens – do you really want a deadly dull management consultant representing you?
And the dismal Labour candidate, Chris Ostrowski, a 28-year-old University of East Anglia graduate who works at department store John Lewis’, is no better. You’d find more life in Michael Jackson’s coffin.
But it’s very likely one or other of these straight-laced dullards will win. Still Norwich North will get some modicum excitement at being able to boast that it has the youngest MP in the Commons, once the by-election is over.
But they’re dull, dull, dull…
Don’t this pair have skeletons in the closet? One or other must have had some form of weird sex at some point in their lives? Or taken drugs? Come on, someone out their in Norwich must have a secret on one of them? Someone must have had weird sex with Chloe or Chris…perhaps at the same time?
If so, reveal it to your humble corespondent! The Norwich North by-election needs some spice.
OK, the by-election is a big deal in terms of the next general election. If Chloe Smith wins, then her puppet-master David Cameron will be about as confident as he can be of becoming the next prime minister.
But who cares about that?
What we want is to see this boring pair take a tumble, and lose the by-election to an independent – or to anyone, I don’t care.
Preferably they’d be caught having weird sex together – or in some kind of outlandish foursome – while snorting cocaine.
Come on Chris and Chloe. Do it for us. Prove you’re not boring. And make the Norwich North by-election go down in history for all the right reasons.
Weird sex and drugs. That’s what we want.
The battle lines are drawn in the Norwich North by-election fight to nab the seat left empty by Labour’s Ian Gibson, who was forced to resign over the MPs expenses scandal.
The odds-on favourite to win the hotly-contested seat, which will be fought on July 23rd, is 27-year-old Conservative Chloe Smith, who has fierce ambition for a career in politics written all over her (this isn’t a good thing, in case you were wondering).
The hapless Labour candidate, Chris Ostrowski, a member of Labour’s Christian Socialist movement (Christ, not more Christians), isn’t considered to have a hope in hell – even Gordon Brown is tetchily refusing to discuss his chances.
David Cameron, who has visited Norwich North twice to support Chloe Smith, thinks his party has the contest in the bag.
Well, I wouldn’t be so sure, Dave…
The Libertarians have come to town in the form of 18-year-old Thomas Burridge. He vows to make Chloe Smith and her brand of career Conservatism "history."
OK. He might not do it this time round. But the likes of Chloe Smith, who represent the "old guard" of professional politicians, will go the way of the dinosaurs one day (arguably in less than a decade).
Why?
Because no substance, image-only politicians like Chloe Smith (and her puppet master David Cameron) are NOT relevant to Britain’s society today. They are not interested in life experience. All they are after is a career in politics.
In other words, they have their sights on YOUR (tax) money. Yes, they might do a token job of cleaning up MPs expenses. But make no mistake, professional politicians like Chloe Smith and David Cameron will find a way of getting their "squeaky clean" mits on your tax dollars (I’d should have said pounds, but it never sounds as good).
Why are the Libertarians any different?
Because Libertarians do not believe in career politics. Nor do they believe in big, bloated government – local or national. They believe in low taxes and freedom of the individual to live his or her life as they choose, so long as it does not harm others in any way.
What’s more, Libertarians encourage self-reliance and entrepreneurship. Unlike the Tories and Labour, they don’t maintain a welfare system that makes if more lucrative for a million or more people to languish on incapacity benefits, rather than gain the self-respect of earning money through a job or by being self-employed.
But wait, the Norwich North Libertarian candidate is only 18…
You could argue that a kid of 18 hasn’t got any life experience. And you’d have a fair point. But if you bear in mind that 1 million 18-24 year olds in Britain have no training and no jobs, you could argue that Thomas Burridge is a valid spokesperson for his generation – unlike the Tory Cloe Smith who, as I’ve said, is merely looking to feather her nest as a professional politician.
Ian Parker-Joseph, leader of the Libertarian Party UK, puts it this way:
"One of the things that has been made clear, especially by the younger members of our party, is that the so called ’experts’, the ’professional politicians’ and the older generations have seriously let them down, left them with debts that they will probably never be able to repay and they are mightily hacked off about it.
"They now want their say, in the places that matter, in those places where the decisions are made, and Thomas is one such young man, who having now completed his exams in political studies is ready to stand up and be counted.
"It comes down to the old adage, If you keep voting the same, you will continue to get the same. So it is time for new, fresh faces with fresh ideas to come forward to keep these older politicians on their toes, to start putting forward policies that put the people first, that honestly take care of our rights, liberties and freedoms that the older generations of politicians have eroded, and are continuing to undermine and erode."
Lastly, all I can say is: Don’t vote for career politicians like Chloe Smith, they’ll only rip you off for yet more taxes (the Tories aren’t really the party of low taxes, any more than Labour is).
Instead, vote Libertarian. Vote for individual freedom. Be all that you can be.
Visit: http://www.lpuk.org/
Despite the recession, Gordon Brown and his robber baron Labour Party cronies are to plough a whopping £1800 million into social housing.
Where’s he getting the money from?
Us, of course.
OK. You say this will help the needy. I don’t think so. Walk around any council estate and note the new and often flashy parked in the drives – all subsidized by cheap rents courtesy of the council tax payer.
A relative of mine and his wife have lived in social housing for decades. They’ve always had well-paid blue collar jobs. And surprise, surprise, they’ve always had new cars, foreign holidays, and many, many luxuries in life.
The equivalent couple in the private sector would have had to scrimp and save.
Therefore the social housing system is unfair.
So let’s get rid of social housing and create fairness. Let’s make sure everyone pays for housing according to the market rate.
Maggie had it right…
Margaret Thatcher recognized the iniquity of the social housing system. Hence she used the ploy of selling off council housing stock. She knew she couldn’t abolish the entrenched socialistic system of social housing in Britain, so offered the carrot of “owning your own home”.
She played on people’s greed. Existing council tenants were able to buy their homes at knock down prices and, if they so wished, sell them at a profit.
Margaret Thatcher only did what she had to do.
Only for the needy…
But if we’ve got to stick with the system we’ve got, then one solution would be to ensure that only the needy have access to social housing. – with the proviso that when they find themselves on a reasonable income, they would have to hand their home over to someone less fortunate than themselves, and enter the private sector.
My relative should have done that.
Ideally, of course, if we have to have social housing, I’d take it out of state control altogether and put it in the private sector. But then I’d make everything part of the free market and have a tiny, tiny government.
Someone on my Facebook summed up social housing perfectly. He said:
“There’s something very wrong with a society that sees theft (socialism) as not only a virtue, but a moral imperative.”
 | ianmackay88 on Michael Jackson Ghost NEVERLAN… |
 | Gandhi on Norwich North by-election: Sho… |
 | Gandhi on Norwich North by-election: Sho… |
 | Scott on Keep the Greens out of Norwich… |
 | wageslavedave on Lindsay refinery strikes: I wo… |
 | IanPJ on As New Labour crashes and burn… |
